&honey Deep Moist Shampoo 1.0 Review: Pros and Cons After Testing

In testing, this shampoo showed strong cleansing power. When the lard used as a stand-in for sebum was mixed with the shampoo, it removed 188.03 mg of the lard. Since typical sebum levels are estimated at 180 mg for men and 145 mg for women, this result suggests it can effectively wash away excess oil from the scalp and hair.

Other shampoos we tested also removed around 150–230 mg of lard, so overall cleansing performance was high across the group. That said, this product still offers enough cleansing power to remove styling product residue and everyday buildup. It’s a good option for people concerned about greasiness on their hair or scalp.

The range of repair ingredients earned a high evaluation. After reviewing the ingredient list, we confirmed that it contains keratin (wool), a keratin-based protein used as an external repair ingredient. This suggests it can support the repair of hair damaged by coloring and other chemical treatments.

Another plus is the inclusion of hydrolyzed silk, a non-keratin protein that acts as both an internal and external repair ingredient. While it does not contain internal frizz-care ingredients or CMC-like repair components and has fewer repair ingredients than some top-performing products, the formula is still a solid option for those concerned about hair damage.

When tested by 10 male and female monitors, the shampoo’s lathering performance was well received, matching its online reputation. Nine out of 10 testers rated it highly, saying it “lathers quickly” and “cleans thoroughly from roots to ends, even on long hair.” Some of the shampoos we compared were harder to lather with a small amount, but this one is well-suited for people who want to wash their hair quickly and efficiently.

The lather itself is dense, with many testers commenting that it was “long-lasting” and “kept its bounce even after washing.” A few noted that the foam softened slightly while washing, but overall, complaints were minimal. Since hair can be washed while being cushioned by plenty of foam, it’s also a good option for those concerned about friction-related damage.

Tester Comments on Lather and Foam Density:

1. “The lather didn’t form instantly, but there was more than enough foam to coat my hair from roots to ends. The bubbles were thick and bouncy, didn’t collapse easily, and felt long-lasting.” (Male)

2. “As soon as I applied it and started lathering with my hands, it foamed up quickly. The lather was fluffy and didn’t become runny, making it easy to wash with. The bubbles were fine and resistant to collapsing.” (Female)

3. “It lathered very quickly and produced plenty of foam right away. There was enough to fully coat my hair, and the fine bubbles didn’t disappear while washing.” (Female)

Another appealing point is that hair felt smoother after rinsing out the lather. Among the 10 testers who used it, more than half shared positive feedback such as “my fingers moved through my hair smoothly” and “there was no rough or tight feeling.” 

That said, three testers mentioned that while they could run their fingers through their hair, they felt a slight tugging sensation. No one reported the dryness sometimes mentioned in online reviews, but depending on the person, using the shampoo alone may still leave some coarseness. If that’s a concern, pairing it with a conditioner or treatment is recommended.

Tester Comments on Softness After Washing:

1. “I didn’t feel any tightness or coarseness, but I wouldn’t say finger-combing was completely effortless.” (Male)

2. “I have long hair that usually tangles easily, but it rinsed out with a very smooth finger glide.” (Female)

3. “My fingers moved smoothly through my hair, and even with long, wet hair, there was no roughness down to the ends.” (Female)

Overall, testers were highly satisfied with the scent. As the brand describes it, the fragrance is a “peony honey,” with light floral and fruity notes gently coming through. Testers praised it as “perfect for everyday” and “appealing to a wide range of people.”

Some of the other shampoos we compared had fresher or sharper scents. In contrast, a few testers commented that this one felt “a bit too sweet” for their personal taste. It’s best suited for those who enjoy sweet, elegant, floral-style fragrances.

Tester Comments on the Scent:

1. “The fragrance was gentle and not overpowering, making it good for everyday use.” (Female)

2. “I noticed a fruity scent, similar to apple. It was slightly sweet and not really my preference, but it wasn’t unpleasant.” (Male)

3. “It had a subtle, sweet, honey-like floral scent. It smelled very nice, but the fragrance faded while washing, so I wished it lasted a bit longer.” (Female)

After reviewing the ingredient list, we rated it lower for scalp friendliness. The formula contains lauramidopropyl betaine as a cleansing agent and menthol as a cooling ingredient, both of which she noted may cause irritation for people with sensitive skin.

Some of the shampoos we compared did not include ingredients known to irritate sensitive skin and even contained anti-irritation components. In contrast, this product does not include ingredients specifically aimed at preventing skin irritation. If your scalp is sensitive or easily irritated, it may be best to avoid using it.